BOXING MONTHLY logo banner
The Worldwide Boxing Magazine Site
Got your free t-shirt yet?
articles from the magazine ...

December 1999

Each month we bring you a selection of articles from the current and past issues of BOXING MONTHLY. To buy the magazine, see our subscription or back issues pages, or use our world distribution map to find a news-stand copy.

Why not use our Interactive Forum to express your own boxing comments and opinions!

yellow bar

Issue cover AS GOOD AS IT GETS

Finally Lennox Lewis has accomplished his mission. GRAHAM HOUSTON reports from ringside in Las Vegas on the night that a British fighter became undisputed world heavyweight champion


Photo shot

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED: after so long on the outside, Lewis has finally become The Man - Photo John Gichigi - Get Big Pic

The warrior was Evander Holyfield but the winner - and that, in practical terms, is what truly counts - was Lennox Lewis in their heavyweight title rematch at the Thomas & Mack Center, Las Vegas on 13 November.

And Lewis was, I believe, a thoroughly deserving victor even though the decision could be called debatable, with some of the dissenters in the media apparently believing that the verdict was as contentious as the draw of the two fighters’ original meeting last March.

Lewis, to be sure, had to weather some rocky moments before thrusting his arms aloft in the traditional winner’s posture as the final bell ended a hard, tactical, but, I thought, engrossing 12 rounds of boxing. He was sure in his own mind that he had won, and the three Las Vegas judges agreed with him, awarding the London-born World Boxing Council champion a unanimous decision. But the boos showed that there were many in the crowd of 17, 916 who felt that Holyfield had fought well enough to win this defence of his World Boxing Association and International Boxing Federation titles.

But, while not everyone agreed, Lewis got the win that many feel was unjustly denied him by the judges last March, even if it was not in the overwhelming manner he had sought and predicted.

The British contingent estimated at 6,000, some holding aloft Union flags, went ominously quiet at times during a fight in which Holyfield seemed to do most of the damage even though Lewis scored more points.

Of the three judges, Jerry Roth had it the closest, 115-113. Chuck Giampa saw it 116-112 while the 83-year-old Bill Graham made it seem like a one-sided affair with his score of 117-111.

From my seat about 12 rows back but with good sight-lines, I had Lewis winning by 116-112. But I did not keep a running total and must confess that I was surprised, when adding up my score at the finish, that I had it as clearly for Lewis as I did.

At times Lewis was barely eking out the rounds, stealing them with the left jab but stealing them nevertheless, and the simple fact is that at the conclusion of the contest he had won more rounds than had his opponent. But it was easy to see why so many people would favour Holyfield. The 37-year-old, giving away height, reach, 25lbs in weight and three years in age, once more called on his seemingly inexhaustible wellspring of courage, determination and resiliency as he doggedly took the fight to the much bigger man.

He rocked Lewis in several rounds - the seventh in particular when a left hook sent the big man with the Canadian upbringing and the reggae roots tottering back to the ropes on unsteady legs, a sickly grin supplying sure evidence that he had indeed been hurt.

And Lewis looked a bit the worse for wear, his features swollen, a cut over the right eye (caused, it seemed, by a clash of heads), although Holyfield was a little bruised and bumpy around the eyes.

There was no question that Holyfield, a 2-1 underdog, fought a better, tougher fight than he had the first time - just as he had predicted he would - but the physical advantages of Lewis were a little too much.

Lewis had promised to be more assertive than last time, but his truly aggressive surges came only sporadically.

For most of the fight he looked to score points on the outside, and the left jab - even when it was being used only as a defensive pole to keep Holyfield from closing in - was what, in the end, won him the fight.

But it was disconcerting to see Lewis, a man of 6ft 5ins and 242lbs (17st 4lbs) being backed up and at times chased by an older opponent who is so much smaller.

As in the first meeting, which I watched on television, I had the definite impression that Holyfield was the puncher in the ring, the man most likely to do something spectacular with one shot.

In the seventh, and in a couple of other rounds, it seemed that he might do just that, but he was unable to follow up his most vivid moments of ascendancy, largely due to Lewis’s defensive cleverness, plus the fact that the British-born boxer is so huge, so difficult to reach when he pulls his body back to avoid a blow.

But while Lewis rode out these perilous passages it has to be said, that as in the first fight, he was a disappointment in his failure to press home his advantages in a manner that might have given him the opportunity to achieve a resounding triumph.

We saw in the rematch what we saw in the first fight and what we have seen in other Lewis contests, which is a disinclination to put himself at hazard.

Sure, he fought back strongly after getting rattled, and all credit to him for this. But it suited him far more, it seemed, to stay away and pick off the smaller man. This not a matter of lacking heart, I feel, even though many of my American colleagues will disagree, but rather a natural caution, an unwillingness to commit himself to an all-out assault unless he is convinced that the other man is either at his mercy or cannot hurt him. Or a combination of the two.

It appears that he will step right up to the imaginary door behind which lies the possibility of pain or of powerful achievement but will not take the chance to go through it. So he stays on the threshold, using long-arm rather than strong-arm methods, or simply steps back from the danger zone to find a safer position from which to employ his talents.

In many cases - most cases, even - this would be all well and good. What we would call smart boxing. But for a heavyweight of Lewis’s physical dimensions and the impression of power he conveys, we tend to expect more.

Yet Lewis showed character, I thought, in the way he rallied from adversity. Holyfield’s lawyer and confidante, Jim Thomas, said afterwards: "Lennox answered the questions about whether Lennox has a heart. Lennox took some great shots from a great, great fighter and he didn’t quit. And I don’t think a lot of people understand how hard that is, and how much courage it takes to do that."

But it seemed that Lewis only opened up when it was a matter of having either to punch his way clear of trouble or to slow down any momentum that his opponent might have been building. Then it was back to the rooftop sniping type of tactics that, while serving him well in the matter of points scoring, did nothing to advance his reputation in the eyes of his harshest critics, which means, mainly, the American press and public.

It was disconcerting to see Lewis turning to the referee, Mitch Halpern, in complaint when Holyfield bored in with his head down. This was, after all a heavyweight title fight and rough stuff has to be expected.

And in view of Holyfield’s aggression it was not surprising that the decision was booed. Some American newspaper headlines the next day contained the word "robbery", which it wasn’t but which captured the essence of certain reporters’ feelings.

Lewis, sad to say, comes out of the fight with his reputation not much more enhanced than when he went into it.

But here we should give some credit to Holyfield for creating the problems and applying the pressure that not too many heavyweights, one suspects, would have been able to handle.

Holyfield was crafty at ducking under punches and kept his head moving so that Lewis was unable to land too many clean rights, although an uppercut in the ninth clearly shook the older man. But Lewis had success with quick, almost sneaky punches and also did some hefty thumping to the body.

Generally, though, Holyfield was the one throwing the bombs, but in some rounds he spent too long loading up for the next big delivery, and it was in these rounds that Lewis was pulling ahead on the scorecards.

It was not as if Lewis was scared of Holyfield - he showed that by dropping his arms defiantly even when calamity threatened. But neither was he prepared to engage the three-time heavyweight champ from Atlanta, Georgia, in the type of exchanges that would have left no doubt - one way or the other.

Holyfield clearly felt he had won, though, at the post-fight conference, he did not come right out and say it. "I wasn’t happy with the decision but I have to live with it," he said. "God grants victory, man grants decisions." (And women, Evander: remember Eugenia Williams?)

As to his future, he said he will go home, think about it and pray. But, on the evidence of this fight, he still has a lot to offer.

Promoter Don King declined to disagree with the decision. "On March 13th I did not second guess the judges, and I’m not about to second guess them on November 13th," he said.

"I’m happy that we had a great fight and I congratulate the undisputed champion of the world, Lennox Lewis, for a magnificent performance in winning all three belts."

Well, not quite all three, not at first. The IBF belt was not in Lewis’s possession. The New Jersey-based body said that the Lewis camp had not paid the $300,000 sanctioning fee. The Lewis camp’s position was that the sanctioning fee was put into escrow due to the IBF’s legal problems. But on the Monday after the Saturday night fight, agreement was reached, the IBF got its fee and Lewis his belt.

The whole matter of the IBF belt was merely a loose end. Lewis is the champion, in the eyes of the boxing world.

Wearing dark glasses to the post-fight conference, as is his custom, he said: "It’s a great feeling, because a lot of people don’t realise that it’s taken me 10 years I’ve been trying to get the undisputed heavyweight championship of the world and I’ve been through a lot of trials and tribulations. I’ve always said that Lennox Lewis is on a mission, and I’ve finally succeeded in that mission today. I’m going to sit back and relish the moment right now, but I’m willing to take on all-comers."

He said his main objective is to meet all the top heavyweights of his era, which definitely includes Mike Tyson "if the fight can be made". He added: "You have to remember, Tyson gave up the [WBC] belt and went after Evander Holyfield - he didn’t want to fight me."

Lewis confirmed that this fight had been tougher for him than the last one.

"This time around it was more difficult," he said. "He was trying to steal the rounds. I was staying closer to him than last time, to get my power punches off, but his defence was very good."

Holyfield said: "I had to do something different [from the first fight], and so the things I did different kinda messed him up and at times I could catch him with some shots. I couldn’t go out there and commit myself to start off the round, because he was looking for it.

"Victory is doing the very best that I can do, and I did that tonight."

Lewis said he felt he had been more aggressive than last time, saying:

"In some moments in the fight I did show my aggressiveness and I did push Evander Holyfield back to the ropes." He said he wanted to thank the British fans who had supported him through the years and the ones who had travelled to Las Vegas to see him in his most important victory.

"You’re welcome, luv," came a woman’s voice in a cockney accent from somewhere in the crowded assembly.

Emanuel Steward, Lewis’s trainer, said: "It was a much better fight [than the last one] because Evander was more intense, more determined, this fight. He kept his - I call it the Holyfield Jig - his rhythm all the way through. In the first part of the fight I thought Lennox got off early because of dominating with his jab, and in the late rounds I think Lennox’s physical strength was a big factor." But Steward thanked Holyfield for "giving us some of the greatest fights in the past 15 years - regardless of what you decide to do, brother, you’ve been a true warrior and a very exciting fighter for a long period of time".

These sentiments were echoed by Lewis, who said: "I want to thank Evander. He’s a true warrior and he gave me a great fight."

And so the last heavyweight championship fight of the millennium ended on a note of mutual respect all round.

It had been a fight and, I believe, a decision that restored some credibility to a sport that lately has been buffeted by controversy, scandal and big-bout disappointments.

Lewis did not get the knockout, the absolutely-no-arguments triumph, that his camp had forecast, but when all is said and done he did win, he showed he can come back from a crisis and, while not the most dramatic fighter the heavyweight division has ever seen, he is without doubt an able and intelligent boxer.

Perhaps, and I write this two days after the fight, after having had the chance to give due consideration to all that happened in the contest itself and all that went before it, we should appreciate Lewis for what he is, rather than criticise him for what he isn’t.

U.S. PRESS REACTION

WALLACE MATTHEWS (New York Post): Maybe this is boxing’s way of telling Holyfield it is time to quit, or maybe the message is coming from an even higher authority. But if Holyfield can’t win a decision after the way he fought last night, perhaps he just can’t win anymore . . . The Post had Holyfield a 116-112 winner.

STEVE SPRINGER, who scored it 116-113 in favour of Lewis (Los Angeles Times): Holyfield had all his weapons working, and indeed hurt Lewis on several occasions. But in the end, he couldn’t break through to do the kind of damage he had done in the past to win the heavyweight title three times.

DOUG KRIKORIAN, who had it 117-114 in Holyfield’s favour (Long Beach Press-Telegram): . . . for a large portion of a fierce brawl marked by dramatic ebbs and flows, Holyfield out-hustled, out-slugged and out-thought his plodding opponent . . . Indeed, in a performance that defied his age and wealth, the 37-year-old multimillionaire Holyfield seemed to be the dominant fighter in the lively proceedings with his harder punches and more aggressive tactics.

BILL PLASCHKE, who had it 115-113 in favour of Lewis (Los Angeles Times): A heavyweight can win a fight by simply fighting smart. So Lewis did just that.

STEVE SIMMONS (Toronto Sun): The odd part of the judges’ decision was that this fight was far closer than the first Holyfield-Lewis bout in March, which was scored a draw. Some ringside observers had Holyfield winning last night, some had Lewis winning. The Sun scored the bout a draw. Any of those decisions would have been acceptable.

BOB KRAVITZ (Scripps Howard News Service): Of course, a draw would have been an invitation to riot. They had to give it to somebody. The question is, why Lewis? What did he do to win the fight? . . . This was supposed to be the night Lewis was revealed. Instead, it was the night he was exposed.

STEPHEN BRUNT, who had Lewis winning, 115-113 (Toronto Globe and Mail): During the early rounds and in the late rounds, Lewis outboxed Holyfield with relative ease, just as he did the first time they fought in March at Madison Square Garden. Though Holyfield was a whole lot better in the rematch, and especially a whole lot more focused, Lewis still controlled him with the jab, frustrating most of his advances.

BILL LYON (Philadelphia Inquirer): Although the same decision was reached by all three judges, the verdict was far from unanimous among ringsiders. You could find almost as many people who thought Holyfield had won. Included in this group is your humble clerk-typist, who scored it 117-114 for Holyfield. Lest you think this was less than objective assaying, your humble clerk-typist had picked Lewis to win.

RON BORGES (Boston Globe): For 12 rounds, Evander Holyfield appeared to get the better of Lennox Lewis . . . but the three judges saw it differently . . . This time, instead of investigating just one judge [a reference to Eugenia Williams, who had Holyfield beating Lewis in their first bout], the federal government should haul all three up on charges, especially 83-year-old Bill Graham, whose scorecard was an advertisement for mandatory retirement.

GEORGE KIMBALL (Boston Herald): While some fans and media ringsiders scored the fight for Holyfield, they were almost invariably those who either picked Holyfield or bet on him . . . The Herald card had Lewis winning 115-113 although a draw would have been less outrageous in this one than in their first fight.

BERNARD FERNANDEZ, who had Lewis winning, 115-114 (Philadelphia Daily News): Lewis . . . again came across as a technically proficient but passionless automaton who lacks the charisma to get the crowd involved . . . In the battle for most fans’ hearts and minds, Holyfield wins every time.

MICHAEL KATZ (New York Daily News): . . . any attempt to paint the rematch with the same dirt as the original must be based on prejudice against the cocky Briton or for Holyfield. No, Lewis deserved the triumph.

JERRY IZENBERG (Newark Star-Ledger): Lewis was never in serious danger although he often looked exhausted and sporadically fought as though he were. He won it close but he won it fair.

DEAN JUIPE, who had it 114-114, a draw (Las Vegas Sun): That Lewis, by virtue of his three championships, is now the focal center of the sport merely reflects its mediocre condition. Technically he’s the undisputed champion yet there’s considerable dispute whether he truly deserved this victory, and there’s little dispute he is hardly among the all-time greats.

CHRIS JONES, who had Holyfield winning, 115-113 (The National Post, Canada): Lewis seemed more relieved than ecstatic. He raised his arms after the fight, as he had eight months ago, but the joy didn’t seem genuine this time around. It seemed forced.

MICHAEL ROSENTHAL (Los Angeles Daily News): Holyfield was better than he was when he and Lennox Lewis fought to a controversial draw in March, much better. Better against a behemoth like Lewis, who has almost every physical advantage, just wasn’t good enough.

KEVIN KIERNAN (New York Post): The boxing world desperately wanted a knockout and instead got another lukewarm fight.

WILLIAM C. RHODEN (New York Times): Saturday night, boxing got the shot of adrenaline it needed. Lennox Lewis and Holyfield, who fought to a draw eight months ago, gave the sort of epic performance for which boxing at its highest level is known.


Also available to read from issue:

Magazine Contents:
Full details of the December 1999 issue - the complete contents listing.

World Rankings:
See where the top fighters were rated when December 1999 went to press...

20th CENTURY BOXING MYTHS
STEVE FARHOOD explores and explodes five of the biggest boxing myths of the 20th century

AN UGLY MESS
GRAHAM HOUSTON reports from Detroit as Naseem Hamed makes no friends with a shabby performance against Cesar Soto


On sale on the last Thursday of every month
Next issue out on [an error occurred while processing this directive]

Ensure you never miss a copy . . . buy your subscription or back issues here.